Four attorneys talkingAttorneys admitted in multiple states and the District of Columbia. Practicing nationwide on a pro haec vice basis.
Principal offices in Baltimore, MD and Columbia, SC (888) 463-3529, (410) 653-3200
this is a line spacer
this is a line spacer
Janet, Jenner & Suggs logo Bringing the Plaintiff's Perspective to Business Litigation
this is another spacer. It offers no pertintent information
Janet Jenner and Suggs LLC This is yet another spacer. It offers no pertinent information.
this is another spacer. It offers no pertintent information  ORAL AGREEMENTS

Broken Oral Agreements

“Our insurance agent told us that we were completely covered, but, when we filed a claim for losses, the insurance company told us that a significant part of our losses were not covered in the plan- That almost killed our business.”

Every day, oral contracts are made with no intention or even feeling that they need to be written down. This may happen in person or over the phone for services or products like utilities, car insurance, or deliveries. The parties orally have agreed to the terms. Or an insurance agent may have interpreted the written contract to say that everything is covered under the policy. That constitutes a contract that is just as binding as a written one.

Many state and federal laws exist to ensure enforcement of oral contracts. While all important contracts should be written, oral contracts are often a convenient and commonly used form of agreement between people or companies.

TOP


What constitutes an oral agreement?

If problems or disagreements should arise, the main problem with an oral contract is that the case becomes one person's word against the other. Some states may have laws (called statutes of frauds) that regulate the type of property or amount of money an oral contract can involve. States also have a statute of limitation on any contract.

Janet, Jenner & Suggs has successfully handled many oral contract cases. To establish the validity of a case, we consider these questions:


Was there an offer and acceptance? A meeting of the minds?

Contracts are not valid until there is an offer and acceptance. A meeting of minds occurs when all parties agree to the material or important terms and conditions of the deal. Usually, this means that if major points such as price are not agreed upon, there is not a binding contract. On the other hand, if the major points are agreed upon, the need to work out minor details or specific contract language may not prevent a meeting of the minds.


Consideration

In any contract, each side must give the other something of value for the agreement to be binding. This could be an exchange of money such as a down payment or a mutual promise of some future benefit.

TOP


When to seek legal advice

The essential problem with oral contracts is that they can be difficult to prove and enforce. The party who chooses not to honor its bargain will claim that no agreement was ever reached or insist that the agreed-upon terms were not as claimed. The case may be decided on whatever evidence is available - notes that were made at the time, witness recollections of what was said, emails, even plain common sense. This is why anything in writing, even doodle filled notepads and backs of envelopes, suddenly take on huge significance.

CASE OVERVIEW: Breach of Contract

Heritage Propane Partners, based in Tulsa, OK, sued SCANA, South Carolina’s largest utility company in 2003, in a contract dispute arising over the bidding process and ultimate sale of SCANA’s propane businesses.

Heritage, now known as Energy Transfer Partners, was approached by SCANA through a SCANA subsidiary, Cornerstone Ventures, about purchasing five of SCANA’s propane companies. As part of the solicitation, Heritage and Cornerstone signed a confidentiality agreement that all information connected with the bid process was to be kept confidential. After a lengthy and expensive process – Heritage told Cornerstone it wished to buy the companies and offered an initial bid. After further negotiations, the two sides came to agreement on all outstanding issues and shook hands. The SCANA senior management team told Heritage, “We have a deal.” The two sides continued to work on finalizing the written documents, agreeing that Heritage would meet with propane employees prior to announcing the agreement publicly. However, SCANA kept delaying the final contract. It turned out that Heritage had been used only as a “stalking horse” to garner a higher bid from another buyer. All the time, expense and expertise that Heritage had expended had only been used to facilitate transactions with a second bidder, enriching the bidder and SCANA at Heritage’s expense.

Breach of contract, fraud, and punitive damages awarded--$48 MILLION

TOP

this is a line spacer
COPYRIGHT © 2006, Janet, Jenner & Suggs, L.L.C.